What value does an intangible concept that caters entirely to social ego have? If this intangible concept can be so subjective, thus implying a purely creative fiction with 6 billion narratives, then the resulting experience of having “taste” can be viewed as inapplicable and invaluable, along with the realm of values and standards. Yet, the objective perspective , a mathematical ratio of 6 billion to 1, loses in weight as the human ego will always prefer its personal subjective intangible, fictional, and marvelously creative values, standards, and tastes above objective facts. True vanity.
And in an entirely different realm of fascinating human phenomenon the illusion of shared and/or common personal subjective intangible, fictional, and marvelously creative values, standards, and taste ( or as more appropriately should be referred to it as “PSIFAMCrVaSAT”) , caused by slight overlapping variations of similar “tastes” and by the lack of (or quickly disappearing) real individualism, exists in cult-like obsessive forms of with which human ego defines the right to hold prejudice towards others without similar overlapping “tastes”. All this stemming from the false pretense to have some form of pseudo-individuality in a globalized world where individuality is dying.